Week in Review: October 2, 2026

October 5, 2026

Overview 

Markets finished the week mixed as weaker employment data and more measured Federal Reserve commentary lowered expectations for an October rate increase, while elevated Treasury yields remained a headwind. The Dow declined approximately 1.3%, the S&P 500 slipped 0.2%, and the Nasdaq gained 0.5%. The 10-Year U.S. Treasury yield ended at 5.28%, reflecting continued uncertainty around growth, inflation, and monetary policy. 

The September employment report provided the clearest indication that the labor market may be losing momentum. Employers added 29,000 jobs during the month, well below expectations for approximately 84,000, while the unemployment rate rose from 4.1% to 4.2%. Employment gains in July and August were also revised lower by a combined 60,000 jobs. Payroll growth has 50,000 jobs over the past three months, suggesting generally solid labor demand though not enough to create urgency for near-term monetary tightening. 

Other economic data painted a different picture. Second quarter real GDP growth was revised higher from an annualized rate of 1.5% to 2.2%, primarily reflecting stronger investment, consumer spending, and government spending. Real final sales to private domestic purchasers, a measure of underlying demand, increased at a 4.6% annualized pace, while first quarter growth was revised to 2.5%. The revisions indicate that the economy carried more momentum through the first half of the year than previously estimated, even as the latest employment data point to some moderation entering the fourth quarter. 

Inflation data was also encouraging, although price pressures remain elevated. The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures), increased 0.3% in August and 3.4% from a year earlier, below expectations for a 3.7% annual increase. Core PCE, excluding food and energy, rose 0.2% for the month and 3.0% annually, also below expectations. Inflation nevertheless remains meaningfully above the Federal Reserve’s 2% objective, leaving policymakers to balance persistent price pressures against a moderating labor market. 

Comments from several Federal Reserve officials reflected this tension. New York Fed President John Williams said there was “no need for urgency” following September’s rate increase, while Vice Chair Philip Jefferson indicated that future policy decisions may require more time and additional data. Vice Chair for Supervision, Michelle Bowman similarly said she did not see an urgent need for further action. Combined with the employment report, the comments lowered the market implied probability of an October rate increase to approximately 16%, from 64% a week earlier. 

Geopolitical uncertainty remained elevated as the U.S. Navy continued rotating aircraft carriers through the Middle East. The USS George Washington relieved the USS Abraham Lincoln in August, while the USS Theodore Roosevelt is expected to eventually relieve the USS George Washington. The Theodore Roosevelt would become the fourth U.S. carrier to support operations in the region during the conflict, highlighting the resources required to sustain the U.S. naval presence and protect regional shipping routes. 

For investors, the week’s developments reinforced the tension between resilient economic growth, moderate employment growth, and persistent inflation. The combination gives the Federal Reserve greater reason to wait before raising rates again, but it does not eliminate the possibility of additional tightening later this year. Markets welcomed the lower probability of an October increase, although elevated Treasury yields and mixed equity returns suggest investors remain sensitive to inflation and geopolitical risks. 

The Details 

Equities 

Equities were little changed for the week, but strength emerged over the last two days once the 10-year Treasury Yield reversed from its highs on Thursday morning. The S&P was down a modest 0.% while the Nasdaq was up 0.5%. The S&P equal weight and Russell 2000 were both down again, making it seven straight down weeks for the S&P EW and six of the last seven for the Russell 2000. 

This week also marked the end of the third quarter. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq were up 2.3% and 2.6%, respectively, for the quarter. Similar to the trend over the last month, the S&P equal-weight and Russell 2000 were both down, falling 1.9% and 7.2%, respectively.  

Energy, up 17%, led sector returns. Persistently high oil and refined product prices, mostly driven by continuing geopolitical tensions involving Iran, have supported a sharp improvement in energy sector earnings. The sector is now up 40% for the year. While it was a volatile quarter for technology shares, the sector was the second-best performing group, up 7.2%. There was some rotation within technology, with semiconductors down 11% while software was up 17%. Semiconductors are still up 79% for the year while software is roughly flat.   

Utilities were the worst-performing sector, down 12.4%, as higher rates likely weighed on the group. Industrials also performed poorly, down 9%. The group was led down by the companies perceived to be the largest beneficiaries of the AI investment cycle. Similar to semiconductors, expectations for many AI-linked industrial companies had become exceptionally high. In many cases, the recent declines appear more reflective of valuation resets than deteriorating business fundamentals. 

As noted for several weeks now, equity market breadth continues to be weak, with a large quantity of index constituents down  over 20% while the index churns near all-time highs. It is difficult to sustain this condition indefinitely. Resolution most often comes with the index joining the average stock lower. As always, investors search for reasons why this time might be different. A reasonable explanation for today’s divergence is that high interest rates and energy prices represent a larger headwind for the average company than for the mega-cap tech companies that continue to drive both market performance and economic growth. While that may prove correct, markets generally become more resilient when gains are supported by a broader group of companies rather than a relatively small number of leaders. 

The economy and earnings remain strong now, but markets are forward looking. Sustained higher energy costs and interest rates could cause some economic slowing, with a lag. The majority of companies will start to report third quarter earnings in two weeks. The results should be strong. But investors will be looking for clues as to how these potential headwinds will impact the sustainability of strong earnings into 2027.  

Fixed Income 

This week offered a slight reprieve after September’s sharp bond-market selloff. Weaker-than-expected payrolls supported the short end of the Treasury curve on Friday, while Federal Reserve officials backed away from the urgency of another October rate hike. The shift did not reverse the market’s “higher for longer” outlook, but it did lower the temperature around the next meeting.  

The Treasury market did not stage a broad rally. The curve steepened modestly over the week, with the 2-year closing Friday at 4.829%, the 5-year at 5.055%, the 10-year at 5.275%, and the 30-year at 5.623%. Friday’s payroll report gave the front end some relief, but the long end remained under pressure. Still, after the sharp and disruptive moves of recent weeks, this week’s rise in yields felt more orderly and subdued.  

The 5-year Treasury has spent much of the last week above 5%. That level is worth unpacking from an investor’s perspective through the concept of break-even yield. At current levels, the income on a newly purchased 5-year Treasury could offset roughly a 100-basis-point rise in yields over a one-year holding period before total return turns negative. In other words, yields would need to move from about 5% to above 6% within a year before the price decline overwhelms the income earned. That is not protection from volatility, but it is a meaningful cushion. Investors buying 5-year Treasuries near 1% in 2021 had almost no cushion. Today, there is meaningful upside if rates decline, while coupon income provides a buffer if rates continue to rise. That math is compelling for investors and can create demand.  

Global bond markets remain under pressure, with attention this week shifting to France and the broader European credit market. After France released a budget proposal that investors viewed as nearly impossible to execute, European markets experienced both rate cheapening and wider spreads across countries. That dispersion matters because the eurozone depends on a single monetary policy transmitting smoothly across very different sovereign bond markets. Wider country-level spreads do not automatically mean fragmentation, but they raise the stakes when fiscal concerns begin to affect relative borrowing costs and investor confidence across the region. French fiscal concerns added to scrutiny of government borrowing across the region, while European investment-grade spreads widened to 95 basis points, approaching their widest level of the year. European officials are increasingly worried that member countries are asking for fiscal leniency while the bond market is demanding the opposite. France is not, by itself, the driver of the global selloff. Instead, the French headlines reflect a broader tension visible across Europe and globally: governments need to borrow heavily at a time when investors are demanding more compensation for inflation, duration, and fiscal risk.  

The investment-grade market spent the week absorbing the financing for Paramount Skydance’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The package included approximately $41.4 billion and €885 million of senior secured notes, along with $8.5 billion in term loans. Demand materialized, including more than $23 billion of orders for the high-yield portion, but only with meaningful yield concessions. The new bonds then weakened in the secondary market, adding to frustration over how primary supply is pricing and subsequently trading. The Paramount transaction showed how much more difficult execution has become as rates moved higher this summer. Dealers can still price large deals, but managers are no longer getting the immediate price support they have historically expected after new issuance. That support has faded over the last few months and has become another driver of bond-market cheapening.  

Municipal bonds were quieter this week after a punishing September. The Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index lost 3.98% during the month, nearly twice the 2.02% loss in Treasuries and the worst performance among the major fixed-income sectors. This week looked calmer on the surface, with the municipal curve steepening as the short end rallied up to 10 basis points while the 30-year cheapened slightly by 2 basis points. Underneath that calmer price action, tax-loss harvesting was the story: muni trading hit 117,419 trades reported to the MSRB, the highest single-day trade count since at least 1995. Par amount traded was elevated but not a record, suggesting the volume came from a large number of smaller retail and separately managed account transactions rather than institutional block selling. The calmer week did not change the larger point: September was one of the most difficult months for municipal investors in recent memory. 

Trust, estate planning, insurance, and investment products are not a deposit, not FDIC insured, not insured by any federal government agency, not guaranteed, subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested and may go down in value. Any information and research contained herein do not represent a recommendation of investment advice to buy or sell stocks or any financial instrument nor is it intended as an endorsement of any security or investment, and it does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or investment services. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Please consult your legal or tax advisor for specific guidance tailored to your situation. First Western Trust Bank cannot provide tax advice.