Have You Conducted a Fee Equalization/Levelization?

May 25, 2018

Bill Tugaw, Governmental Plan Practice Leader

Fees in defined contribution (DC) plans can be complicated. Historically, fees have not been fully and simply disclosed, but the industry is changing towards greater and more understandable disclosure.

Simply put, there are two basic types of fees: administrative and investment-related. The investment-related fees are deducted from earnings on participant accounts and will vary from one investment to the next. These fees are paid to the firms that are making decisions about how the various funds are invested in the market. Participants will pay different investment-related fees, as the fees are based on where the participant chooses to invest their assets.

Administrative fees are also deducted from participant accounts. If the plan has not implemented a fee equalization (also known as fee levelization), administrative fees will also vary from one investment to the next. Administrative fees are designed to pay for administrative-related activities associated with recordkeeping participant accounts. Such activities can include marketing, statements, education, processing contributions, and withdrawals, issuing required tax forms and meetings with local representatives.

Fee equalization addresses the equity of the administrative fees being charged to participants. Unlike the duties associated with investment management, duties associated with administering participant accounts do not change depending on where a participant has directed his or her investments. Arguments can easily be made that administrative fees should be the same for all participants because they have the same recordkeeping requirements. In our experience, regardless of investment selection, account value, contribution level – the administrative duties are equal for all participants, so the administrative fees should also be equal.

About the Author, Bill Tugaw

Bill has over 30 years of diversified financial services experience and specializes in public sector 457(b) Deferred Compensation, 403(b), 401(k), 401(a) defined contribution plan consulting and post-employment health plans (VEBA, 115 Integral Part Trusts, Retiree Health Savings Accounts). His primary focus is assisting public sector employers in meeting the fiduciary obligations associated with operating their plans.

Insights

The IRS Announces 3 Key Changes to 401(k) Plans for 2025: How to Maximize Your Retirement Savings

The IRS has recently unveiled important changes to 401(k) plans for 2025, offering new opportunities for workers to boost their […]

Learn more

Tax-Efficient Retirement Planning: Strategies to Optimize Your Wealth in Retirement

When planning for retirement, maximizing wealth and managing tax burdens are essential to ensure your hard-earned savings work for you. […]

Learn more

Week in Review: December 23, 2024

Recap & Commentary Markets ended the week lower, reacting poorly to revised Federal Reserve guidance following the bank’s December FOMC […]

Learn more

Understanding Risk Tolerance: How to Align Your Investments with Your Financial Goals

For high-net-worth individuals, effective wealth management goes beyond maximizing returns. It requires aligning investments with personal risk tolerance and financial […]

Learn more

Is It Time for a Wealth Manager? Key Signs and Benefits of Professional Financial Guidance

Managing significant wealth is complex and often requires a strategic approach to ensure financial security, growth, and legacy. Hiring a […]

Learn more

Ready to learn more?
Let’s have a conversation.

Embark on a banking experience tailored to your distinct path, focused on achieving personal and business financial prosperity.