Have You Conducted a Fee Equalization/Levelization?

May 25, 2018

Bill Tugaw, Governmental Plan Practice Leader

Fees in defined contribution (DC) plans can be complicated. Historically, fees have not been fully and simply disclosed, but the industry is changing towards greater and more understandable disclosure.

Simply put, there are two basic types of fees: administrative and investment-related. The investment-related fees are deducted from earnings on participant accounts and will vary from one investment to the next. These fees are paid to the firms that are making decisions about how the various funds are invested in the market. Participants will pay different investment-related fees, as the fees are based on where the participant chooses to invest their assets.

Administrative fees are also deducted from participant accounts. If the plan has not implemented a fee equalization (also known as fee levelization), administrative fees will also vary from one investment to the next. Administrative fees are designed to pay for administrative-related activities associated with recordkeeping participant accounts. Such activities can include marketing, statements, education, processing contributions, and withdrawals, issuing required tax forms and meetings with local representatives.

Fee equalization addresses the equity of the administrative fees being charged to participants. Unlike the duties associated with investment management, duties associated with administering participant accounts do not change depending on where a participant has directed his or her investments. Arguments can easily be made that administrative fees should be the same for all participants because they have the same recordkeeping requirements. In our experience, regardless of investment selection, account value, contribution level – the administrative duties are equal for all participants, so the administrative fees should also be equal.

About the Author, Bill Tugaw

Bill has over 30 years of diversified financial services experience and specializes in public sector 457(b) Deferred Compensation, 403(b), 401(k), 401(a) defined contribution plan consulting and post-employment health plans (VEBA, 115 Integral Part Trusts, Retiree Health Savings Accounts). His primary focus is assisting public sector employers in meeting the fiduciary obligations associated with operating their plans.

Insights

Week in Review: May 26, 2026

Recap & Commentary U.S. equity markets ended positive on the week as investors grew increasingly optimistic that diplomatic negotiations between […]

Learn more

Week in Review: May 15, 2026

Recap & Commentary The S&P 500 ended the week effectively unchanged while most other equity indices closed lower, pressured by […]

Learn more

A Strategic Approach to Business Wealth Diversification

For many entrepreneurs and business owners, building a successful company becomes far more than a professional achievement. It becomes the foundation o

Learn more

April 2026 Market Commentary

After a bruising March in which fighting between the US and Iran triggered a global energy supply shock, reignited inflation […]

Learn more

Week in Review: May 8, 2026

Recap & Commentary Markets ended the week higher with the S&P 500 at a new record high, as the index […]

Learn more

Ready to learn more?
Let’s have a conversation.

Embark on a banking experience tailored to your distinct path, focused on achieving personal and business financial prosperity.